Krauss Bachelor Thesis

Krauss Bachelor Thesis

• Empty section 2, 2.1, 2.1.1, superfluous
• chaotic structure in section 2, mixes some info already mentioned in 1, but not clear what’s the point
• at times chaotic, loosing train of thought
• page 10, intro about some paper, long digression, back to paper
• Attached in the Appendix. But which page (p 11)
• Toys categorization, too far away from the main point of the causes of discrimination in STEM. Clear how it relates to some form of discrimination in general, it becomes clear how does this translate to the discrimination in STEM much too late.
• On p. 15 cited the grant application rather than the research publications that resulted from it
• page 24. not really cost of missing STEM female workers. Child-bearing penalty not really resulting from bias in STEM.
• Chapter 4’s purpose not clear. Topics considered there not really related to the gender gap in STEM education.